Find out more about A.I.den - our SearchBot

CD8 Alpha antibody | MIL12

100% Secure
Anti Pig wCD8 Alpha Antibody, clone MIL12 thumbnail image 1 Anti Pig wCD8 Alpha Antibody, clone MIL12 thumbnail image 2 Anti Pig wCD8 Alpha Antibody, clone MIL12 thumbnail image 3 Anti Pig wCD8 Alpha Antibody, clone MIL12 thumbnail image 4
Anti Pig wCD8 Alpha Antibody, clone MIL12 gallery image 1
Figure A. FITC conjugated mouse anti porcine CD45a (MCA1751F) and RPE conjugated mouse IgG2a isotype control (MCA929PE). Figure B. FITC conjugated mouse anti porcine CD45a (MCA1751F) and RPE conjugated mouse anti porcine CD8a (MCA1223PE). All experiments performed on red cell lysed porcine blood gated on lymphocytes. Data acquired on the ZE5™ Cell Analyzer.
Anti Pig wCD8 Alpha Antibody, clone MIL12 gallery image 2
Published customer image:
Mouse anti Pig wCD8 alpha antibody, clone MIL12 (MCA1223GA) used for the evaluation of CD7α expression on porcine lymphocytes by flow cytometry.
Image caption:
Frequency of leukocyte subsets in PBMC and LPMC using FCM analysis A) shows a representative FCM analysis (n=4) from PBMCs (left) and LPMC (right) isolated from 6 week old pigs were analysed on the frequencies of different immune cell subsets using three-color FCM. Forward scatter (FSC) and side scatter (SSC) were used to gate on leukocytes (PBMCs (a) and LPMC (h) for further analysis of myeloid cells (CD172+; b and i), NK cells (CD3- CD8α+; c and j), B cells (CD21+; e and l) and T cells (CD3+; d and k). Gated T cells were then further analysed on their CD4/CD8α expression to determine the frequency of CTLs (CD4-CD8αhigh; f and m) and CD4+ T cells (f and m). CD8α expression of CD4+ T cells was also investigated to define the frequency of experienced CD4+ T cells (CD8α+CD4+; g and n). (o) Summarizes the results of this FCM analysis of all four analysed animals. Percentages from the PBMC population are represented by a closed circle and the percentages from the LPMC populations are represented by an open box. (p) and (q) is a pie chart showing the relative average percentage of PBMCs and LPMCs from all 4 animals.

From: Pasternak JA, Ng S, Kaser T, Meurens F, Wilson HL (2014) Grouping Pig-Specific Responses to Mitogen with Similar Responder Animals may Facilitate the Interpretation of Results Obtained in an Out-Bred Animal Model.
J Vaccines Vaccin 5:242.
Anti Pig wCD8 Alpha Antibody, clone MIL12 gallery image 3
Figure A. FITC conjugated mouse anti porcine CD5 (MCA2307F) and RPE conjugated mouse IgG1 isotype control (MCA928PE). Figure B. FITC conjugated mouse anti porcine CD5 (MCA2307F) and RPE conjugated mouse anti porcine CD8a (MCA1223PE). All experiments performed on red cell lysed porcine blood gated on mononuclear cells.
Anti Pig wCD8 Alpha Antibody, clone MIL12 gallery image 4
Figure A. RPE conjugated mouse anti porcine CD8a (MCA1223PE) and FITC conjugated mouse IgG2a isotype control (MCA929F). Figure B. RPE conjugated mouse anti porcine CD8a (MCA1223PE) and FITC conjugated mouse anti porcine CD5 (MCA2307F). All experiments performed on red cell lysed porcine blood gated on mononuclear cells.

Mouse anti Pig wCD8 Alpha:FITC

Mouse anti Pig wCD8 Alpha

Mouse anti Pig wCD8 Alpha:RPE

Product Type
Monoclonal Antibody
Clone
MIL12
Isotype
IgG2a
Product Code Applications Pack Size List Price Quantity
MCA1223F
Datasheet
F
MSDS
0.1 mg loader

MCA1223GA
Datasheet
C F
MSDS
0.1 mg loader

MCA1223PE
Datasheet
F
MSDS
100 Tests loader

Mouse anti Pig wCD8 alpha antibody, clone MIL12 recognizes an epitope on the alpha chain of porcine wCD8. Clone MIl12 was clustered at the Third International Swine CD Workshop (Haverson et al. 2001). Clone MIL12 was determined to bind to the CD8a epitope on the alpha chain based on its staining pattern on T lymphocytes and on its ability to block binding of the previously characterized CD8a antibody clone 76-2-11 to T lymphocytes (Saalmuller et al.2001).

Product Details

Target Species
Pig
Product Form
Purified IgG conjugated to Fluorescein Isothiocyanate Isomer 1 (FITC) - liquid
Product Form
Purified IgG - liquid
Product Form
Purified IgG conjugated to R. Phycoerythrin (RPE) - lyophilized
Reconstitution
Reconstitute with 1.0 ml distilled water
Preparation
Purified IgG prepared by affinity chromatography on Protein A from tissue culture supernatant
Preparation
Purified IgG prepared by affinity chromatography on Protein A from tissue culture supernatant
Preparation
Purified IgG prepared by affinity chromatography on Protein A from tissue culture supernatant
Buffer Solution
Phosphate buffered saline
Buffer Solution
Phosphate buffered saline
Buffer Solution
Phosphate buffered saline
Preservative Stabilisers
0.09%Sodium Azide
1%Bovine Serum Albumin
Preservative Stabilisers
0.09% Sodium Azide (NaN3)
Preservative Stabilisers
0.09%Sodium Azide
1%Bovine Serum Albumin
Carrier Free
Yes
Immunogen
Porcine mesenteric lymphocytes.
Approx. Protein Concentrations
IgG concentration 0.1mg/ml
Approx. Protein Concentrations
IgG concentration 1.0 mg/ml
Fusion Partners
Spleen cells from immunised BALB/c mice were fused with cells of the P3 - X63 - Ag.653 myeloma cell line.

Storage Information

Storage
Store at +4oC or at -20oC if preferred.

This product should be stored undiluted.

Storage in frost free freezers is not recommended. This product is photosensitive and should be protected from light.

Avoid repeated freezing and thawing as this may denature the antibody. Should this product contain a precipitate we recommend microcentrifugation before use.
Storage
Store at +4oC or at -20oC if preferred.

This product should be stored undiluted.

Storage in frost-free freezers is not recommended. Avoid repeated freezing and thawing as this may denature the antibody. Should this product contain a precipitate we recommend microcentrifugation before use.
Storage
Prior to reconstitution store at +4oC. Following reconstitution store at +4oC.

DO NOT FREEZE.

This product should be stored undiluted. This product is photosensitive and should be protected from light. Should this product contain a precipitate we recommend microcentrifugation before use.
Guarantee
18 months from date of despatch.
Guarantee
18 months from date of despatch.
Guarantee
12 months from date of reconstitution.

More Information

Regulatory
For research purposes only

Applications of CD8 Alpha antibody

This product has been reported to work in the following applications. This information is derived from testing within our laboratories, peer-reviewed publications or personal communications from the originators. Please refer to references indicated for further information. For general protocol recommendations, please visit the antibody protocols page.
Application Name Verified Min Dilution Max Dilution
Flow Cytometry Neat
Flow Cytometry 1/25 1/200
Immunohistology - Frozen
Flow Cytometry Neat
Where this antibody has not been tested for use in a particular technique this does not necessarily exclude its use in such procedures. Suggested working dilutions are given as a guide only. It is recommended that the user titrates the antibody for use in their own system using appropriate negative/positive controls.
Where this product has not been tested for use in a particular technique this does not necessarily exclude its use in such procedures. Suggested working dilutions are given as a guide only. It is recommended that the user titrates the product for use in their own system using appropriate negative/positive controls.
Where this antibody has not been tested for use in a particular technique this does not necessarily exclude its use in such procedures. Suggested working dilutions are given as a guide only. It is recommended that the user titrates the antibody for use in their own system using appropriate negative/positive controls.
Flow Cytometry
Use 10ul of the suggested working dilution to label 106 cells in 100ul.
Flow Cytometry
Use 10ul of the suggested working dilution to label 106 cells in 100ul.
Flow Cytometry
Use 10ul of the suggested working dilution to label 106 cells in 100ul.
Copyright © 2019 Bio-Rad Antibodies (formerly AbD Serotec)

Secondary Antibodies Available

Description Product Code Applications Pack Size List Price Quantity
Human anti Mouse IgG2a:FITC HCA037F F 0.1 mg loader
Human anti Mouse IgG2a:HRP HCA037P E 0.1 mg loader
Goat anti Mouse IgG (H/L):Alk. Phos. (Multi Species Adsorbed) STAR117A E WB 0.5 mg loader
Goat anti Mouse IgG (H/L):DyLight®488 (Multi Species Adsorbed) STAR117D488GA F IF 0.1 mg loader
Goat anti Mouse IgG (H/L):DyLight®680 (Multi Species Adsorbed) STAR117D680GA F WB 0.1 mg loader
Goat anti Mouse IgG (H/L):DyLight®800 (Multi Species Adsorbed) STAR117D800GA F IF WB 0.1 mg loader
Goat anti Mouse IgG (H/L):FITC (Multi Species Adsorbed) STAR117F F 0.5 mg loader
Goat anti Mouse IgG (H/L):HRP (Multi Species Adsorbed) STAR117P E WB 0.5 mg loader
Goat anti Mouse IgG (Fc):FITC STAR120F C F 1 mg loader
Goat anti Mouse IgG (Fc):HRP STAR120P E WB 1 mg loader
Rabbit F(ab')2 anti Mouse IgG:RPE STAR12A F 1 ml loader
Rabbit F(ab')2 anti Mouse IgG:HRP (Human Adsorbed) STAR13B C E P RE WB 1 mg loader
Goat anti Mouse IgG:FITC (Rat Adsorbed) STAR70 F 0.5 mg loader
Goat anti Mouse IgG:RPE (Rat Adsorbed) STAR76 F 1 ml loader
Goat anti Mouse IgG:HRP (Rat Adsorbed) STAR77 C E P 0.5 mg loader
Goat anti Mouse IgG/A/M:Alk. Phos. STAR87A C E WB 1 mg loader
Goat anti Mouse IgG/A/M:HRP (Human Adsorbed) STAR87P E 1 mg loader
Rabbit F(ab')2 anti Mouse IgG:Dylight®800 STAR8D800GA F IF WB 0.1 mg loader
Rabbit F(ab')2 anti Mouse IgG:FITC STAR9B F 1 mg loader

Negative Isotype Controls Available

Description Product Code Applications Pack Size List Price Quantity
Mouse IgG2a Negative Control:FITC MCA929F F 100 Tests loader
Mouse IgG2a Negative Control MCA929 F 100 Tests loader
Mouse IgG2a Negative Control:RPE MCA929PE F 100 Tests loader

Application Based External Images

Flow Cytometry

Immunofluorescence

Immunohistology - Frozen

Product Specific References

References for CD8 Alpha antibody

  1. Sarradell, J. et al. (2003) A morphologic and immunohistochemical study of the bronchus-associated lymphoid tissue of pigs naturally infected with Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae.
    Vet Pathol. 40: 395-404.
  2. Kick, A.R. et al. (2011) Evaluation of peripheral lymphocytes after weaning and vaccination for Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae.
    Res Vet Sci. 91 (3): e68-72.
  3. Tambuyzer, B.R. et al. (2012) Osteopontin alters the functional profile of porcine microglia in vitro.
    Cell Biol Int. 36 (12): 1233-8.
  4. Cao, D. et al. (2010) Synthetic innate defence regulator peptide enhances in vivo immunostimulatory effects of CpG-ODN in newborn piglets.
    Vaccine. 28: 6006-13.
  5. Clapperton, M. et al. (2005) Innate immune traits differ between Meishan and Large White pigs.
    Vet Immunol Immunopathol. 104: 131-44.
  6. Goujon, J.M. et al. (2000) Influence of cold-storage conditions on renal function of autotransplanted large pig kidneys.
    Kidney Int. 58: 838-50.
  7. Piva, A. et al. (2005) Activated carbon does not prevent the toxicity of culture material containing fumonisin B1 when fed to weanling piglets.
    J Anim Sci. 83 (8): 1939-47.
  8. Hauet, T. et al. (2002) Polyethylene glycol reduces the inflammatory injury due to cold ischemia/reperfusion in autotransplanted pig kidneys.
    Kidney Int. 62: 654-67.
  9. Kick, A.R. et al. (2012) Effects of stress associated with weaning on the adaptive immune system in pigs.
    J Anim Sci. 90: 649-56.
  10. Shi, K. et al. (2008) Changes in peripheral blood leukocyte subpopulations in piglets co-infected experimentally with porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus and porcine circovirus type 2.
    Vet Microbiol. 129: 367-77.
  11. Spreeuwenberg, M.A. et al. (2001) Small intestine epithelial barrier function is compromised in pigs with low feed intake at weaning.
    J Nutr. 131: 1520-7.
  12. Clapperton, M. et al. (2008) Pig peripheral blood mononuclear leucocyte subsets are heritable and genetically correlated with performance.
    Animal. 2: 1575-84.
  13. Leifer, I. et al. (2012) Characterization of C-strain "Riems" TAV-epitope escape variants obtained through selective antibody pressure in cell culture.
    Vet Res. 43: 33.
  14. Tuchscherer, M. et al. (2012) Effects of inadequate maternal dietary protein:carbohydrate ratios during pregnancy on offspring immunity in pigs.
    BMC Vet Res. 8: 232.
  15. Lu, X. et al. (2012) Genome-wide association study for T lymphocyte subpopulations in swine.
    BMC Genomics. 13: 488.
  16. Swamy, H.V. et al. (2003) Effects of feeding a blend of grains naturally contaminated with Fusarium mycotoxins on growth and immunological measurements of starter pigs, and the efficacy of a polymeric glucomannan mycotoxin adsorbent.
    J Anim Sci. 81: 2792-803.
  17. Monroy-Salazar, H.G. et al. (2012) Effects of a live yeast dietary supplement on fecal coliform counts and on peripheral blood CD4+ and CD8+ lymphocyte subpopulations in nursery pigs.
    J Swine Health Prod. 20: 276–282.
  18. Ostrowska, E. et al. (2004) Effects of dietary conjugated linoleic acid on haematological and humoral responses in the grower pig.
    Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 55: 711–718
  19. Carter, D.B. et al. (2002) Phenotyping of transgenic cloned piglets.
    Cloning Stem Cells. 4: 131-45.
  20. Stenfeldt, C. et al. (2014) Morphologic and phenotypic characteristics of myocarditis in two pigs infected by foot-and mouth disease virus strains of serotypes O or A.
    Acta Vet Scand. 56: 42.
  21. Zeigler, B.M. et al. (2015) The development and validation of methods for evaluating the immune system in preweaning piglets.
    Food Chem Toxicol. 84: 197-207.
  22. Pasternak, J. A. (2014) Grouping Pig-Specific Responses to Mitogen with Similar Responder Animals may Facilitate the Interpretation of Results Obtained in an Out-Bred Animal Model
    Journal of Vaccines & Vaccination. 05 (05).
  23. Marinaro M et al. (2015) Changes in peripheral blood leucocytes of sheep experimentally infected with Mycoplasma agalactiae.
    Vet Microbiol. 175 (2-4): 257-64.
  24. Liermann, W. et al. (2016) Effects of two commercial diets and technical feed treatment on stomach lesions and immune system of fattening pigs.
    J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl). Nov 2. [Epub ahead of print]
  25. Hemmink, J.D. et al. (2016) Distinct immune responses and virus shedding in pigs following aerosol, intra-nasal and contact infection with pandemic swine influenza A virus, A(H1N1)09.
    Vet Res. 47 (1): 103.
  26. López, E. et al. (2019) Identification of very early inflammatory markers in a porcine myocardial infarction model.
    BMC Vet Res. 15 (1): 91.
  27. Hu, Z. et al. (2019) Genomic variant in porcine TNFRSF1A gene and its effects on TNF signaling pathway in vitro.
    Gene. 700: 105-9.
  28. Fogle, J.E. et al. (2019) Antibiotic Therapy Does Not Alter the Humoral Response to Vaccination for Porcine Circovirus 2 in Weaned Pigs.
    Vet Sci. 6 (2)May 30 [Epub ahead of print].

Further Reading

  1. Piriou-Guzylack, L. (2008) Membrane markers of the immune cells in swine: an update.
    Vet Res. 39: 54.
View more products with CD8 specificity