SLA Class II DQ antibody | K274.3G8
Mouse anti Pig SLA Class II DQ antibody, clone K274.3G8 recognizes SLA DQ molecules which are expressed on all B cells, antigen presenting cells and on certain subsets of resting and activated T cells. The major histocompatibility complex (MHC) is a cluster of genes that are important in the immune response to infections. In pigs, this is referred to as the swine leukocyte antigen (SLA) region. There are 3 major MHC class II proteins encoded by the SLA which are SLA DP, SLA DQ and SLA DR.
- Target Species
- Species Cross-Reactivity
Target Species Cross Reactivity Bovine
- N.B. Antibody reactivity and working conditions may vary between species.
- Product Form
- Purified IgG - liquid
- Purified IgG prepared by affinity chromatography on Protein A
- Buffer Solution
- Phosphate buffered saline
- Preservative Stabilisers
- 0.09% Sodium Azide (NaN3)
- Carrier Free
- Porcine peripheral blood lymphocytes
- Approx. Protein Concentrations
- IgG concentration 1.0 mg/ml
- Fusion Partners
- Spleen cells from immunized mice were fused with cells of the P3-X63-Ag.653 myeloma cell line
- Store at +4oC or at -20oC if preferred.
This product should be stored undiluted.
Storage in frost-free freezers is not recommended. Avoid repeated freezing and thawing as this may denature the antibody. Should this product contain a precipitate we recommend microcentrifugation before use.
- 18 months from date of despatch
- For research purposes only
Applications of SLA Class II DQ antibody
|Application Name||Verified||Min Dilution||Max Dilution|
|Immunohistology - Frozen|
|Immunohistology - Paraffin|
Where this product has not been tested for use in a particular technique this does not necessarily exclude its use in such procedures. Suggested working dilutions are given as a guide only. It is recommended that the user titrates the product for use in their own system using appropriate negative/positive controls.
- Flow Cytometry
- Use 10ul of the suggested working dilution to label 1x106 cells in 100ul
Copyright © 2019 Bio-Rad Antibodies (formerly AbD Serotec)
Secondary Antibodies Available
Negative Isotype Controls Available
|Description||Product Code||Pack Size||Applications||List Price||Quantity|
|Mouse IgG1 Negative Control||MCA928||100 Tests||F|
Product Specific References
References for SLA Class II DQ antibody
Lunney, J.K. (1993) Characterization of swine leukocyte differentiation antigens.
Immunol Today 14: 147-8.
Brodersen, R. et al. (1998) Analysis of the immunological cross reactivities of 213 well characterized monoclonal antibodies with specificities against various leucocyte surface antigens of human and 11 animal species.
Vet Immunol Immunopathol. 64: 1-13.
Sarradell, J. et al. (2003) A morphologic and immunohistochemical study of the bronchus-associated lymphoid tissue of pigs naturally infected with Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae.
Vet Pathol. 40: 395-404.
Inman, C.F. et al. (2010) Dendritic cells interact with CD4 T cells in intestinal mucosa.
J Leukoc Biol. 88: 571-8.
Faure, J.P. et al. (2002) Polyethylene glycol reduces early and long-term cold ischemia-reperfusion and renal medulla injury.
J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 302: 861-70.
Hauet, T. et al. (2002) Polyethylene glycol reduces the inflammatory injury due to cold ischemia/reperfusion in autotransplanted pig kidneys.
Kidney Int. 62: 654-67.
Paillot, R. et al. (2001) Functional and phenotypic characterization of distinct porcine dendritic cells derived from peripheral blood monocytes.
Immunology 102: 396-404.
Yang, P. et al. (2002) Immune cells in the porcine retina: distribution, characterization and morphological features.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 43: 1488-92.
Jayle, C. et al. (2007) Comparison of protective effects of trimetazidine against experimental warm ischemia of different durations: early and long-term effects in a pig kidney model.
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 292: F1082-93.
Park, J.Y. et al. (2008) Characterization of interaction between porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus and porcine dendritic cells.
J Microbiol Biotechnol. 18: 1709-16.
Maasilta, P.K. et al. (2005) Immune cells in a heterotopic lamb-to-pig bronchial xenograft model.
Transpl Int. 18: 1100-8.
Weesendorp E et al. (2013) Phenotypic modulation and cytokine profiles of antigen presenting cells by European subtype 1 and 3 porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus strains in vitro and in vivo.
Vet Microbiol. 167 (3-4): 638-50.
Makala, L.H. et al. (2001) Ontogeny of pig discrete Peyer's patches: expression of surface antigens.
J Vet Med Sci. 63 (6): 625-36.
Facci, M.R. et al. (2010) A comparison between isolated blood dendritic cells and monocyte-derived dendritic cells in pigs.
Immunology. 129 (3): 396-405.
Edamura, K. et al. (2005) Effect of long-term culture on the expression of antigens and adhesion molecule in single porcine pancreatic endocrine cells.
Xenotransplantation. 12 (4): 327-32.
Debeer, S. et al. (2013) Comparative histology and immunohistochemistry of porcine versus human skin.
Eur J Dermatol. 23 (4): 456-66.
Loss, H. et al. (2018) Effects of a pathogenic ETEC strain and a probiotic Enterococcus faecium strain on the inflammasome response in porcine dendritic cells.
Vet Immunol Immunopathol. 203: 78-87.
Vreman, S. et al. (2018) Neonatal porcine blood derived dendritic cell subsets show activation after TLR2 or TLR9 stimulation.
Dev Comp Immunol. 84: 361-70.
Piriou-Guzylack, L. (2008) Membrane markers of the immune cells in swine: an update.
Vet Res. 39: 54.